Thursday, February 28, 2013

Bravo Company Halts Sales To Milwaukee PD

Bravo Company released this statement on their Facebook page today:
While Bravo Company has made a great many friends with the fine officiers that serve in the Milwaukee Police Department, regrettably as of today, we will no longer do business with Chief Edward Flynn and the Milwaukee PD.

They also included a link to the following video:

Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn is not a 2nd Amendment supporter.

He wants your guns taken away.

A few years ago he said:
“My message to my troops is if you see anybody carrying a gun on the streets of Milwaukee, we’ll put them on the ground, take the gun away, and then decide whether you have a right to carry it,” in response to a statement from Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen recognizing that residents of the state have a right to carry firearms openly.
Good job Bravo Company!

They are a quality company with quality products.

Thanks for taking a stand.


  1. Does anybody have a master list of firearms related companies and which of those are taking actions such as the above so we can pressure those who are not taking such actions to do so?


  2. This clown is a lying mother fucking son-of-a-bitch!! Commerce??? Protects the 2A?????? This asshole has clearly had more than his share of the Kool-Aid!!


  3. Just thinking how to stick it in their eye even deeper...
    If I must get rid of my guns, they may be sold for a great deal more than any Government Buy Back program, to some ruthless gang bangers in Washington DC or Chicago or New York or LA who will no doubt put them to use causing a great deal of mayhem for my new enemy, the Gubment, if we in fact become enemies. And they will all be reported as stolen.
    The enemy of my enemy may not ever become my friend, but will become my enemies even bigger pain in the ass. How's that for progress.....

    1. Semper Fi, 03212/28/2013 7:43 PM

      How do you figger you gotta give up your guns?
      I know, you're trying to make a point here, but too many will do exactly that. Give them up because the bad people said we have to.
      How about using them to stand up for yourself, that would be a real good start on your journey into manhood.

  4. So many lies distortions and emotional mis-directions that I can only get a few.

    "high-caliber assault weapons" being self-referentially impossible. An "assault rifle" is either a weak pistol caliber or a low-recoil carbine round, and must be capable of select fire. In the real world where words mean specific things, "assault weapons" are NFA devices featuring short barrels and are legally machine guns. These are already highly restricted, and carefully controlled (except for "rogue" L. A. ex-cops).

    Add this police commander to the list that includes treasonous General Officers.

  5. Anony-mouse 16:42
    Wrong again. The term "assault weapon" is a libtard made up phrase that has no meaning. It was made up to scare the low info voter into going along with the libtard gun grab policies.
    An assault weapon can be anything around you that you can use to hurt someone. A rock, a fry pan, a chair, an automobile, a broom, whatever.
    As opposed to the term "assault RIFLE", which has an exact definition.

    B Woodman

    1. Good point, Mr. Woodman. However, I think as a community, we need to beging using dagubments own nomanclature wheh refering to the semi-auto weapons. You may have seen the recent posting about the DHS's purchase order for 7,000 Pesonal Defense Weapon for its employees. In the description, a PDW is capable of select fire! Our PDW's would therefore correcly be called limited capability Personal Defense Weapons. POPULARIZING this term would certianly cut the Marxist anti-freedom gang off at their knees. Please feel free to use that term in all future commentary.